The 1970s film previously closest to capturing the buzz of Star Wars was probably Steven Spielberg’s 1975 feature Jaws, a tension-filled monster-movie featuring an exaggeration of a real world shark terrorizing a small community and eating several inhabitants (including children) in the process. The 1970s was a decade greatly defined by somber and serious cinema – The Deer Hunter, Taxi Driver, The Exorcist, The French Connection, The Godfather, A Clockwork Orange, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, and Chinatown – although all great movies, they don’t exactly fit the ‘Fun for all the Family’ market. Star Wars exploded into the perfect pop-cultural storm it was a refreshing distraction from a decade tired of serious issues and scandals: a messy war in Vietnam, the Watergate scandal, a recession, and the energy crisis. Released at the end of a turbulent decade for the West, it was a space age fairy tale filled with visual spectacle and feel-good escapism. Http ://ww w.lul u.com /shop /eric -duba y/t.George Lucas’s 1977 feature Star Wars had a massive cultural influence.
Htt p://w ww.lu lu.co m/sho p/eri c-dub ay/t. ’” -Lady Blount and Albert Smith, “Zetetic Astronomy” (14) The hypothesis of a universal force called Gravi tatio n is based upon, and was indeed invented with a view to support another hypot hesis, namely, that the earth and sea together make up a vast globe, whirling away through space, and therefore needing some force or forces to guide it in its mad career, and so control it as to make it conform to what is called its annual orbit round the sun! The theory first of all makes the earth to be a globe then not a perfect globe, but an oblate spheroid, flattened at the ‘poles’ then more oblate, until it was in danger of becoming so flattened that it would be like a cheese and, passing over minor variations of form, we are finally told that the earth is pear- shape d, and that the ‘elipsoid has been replaced by an apoid!’ What shape it may assume next we cannot tell it will depend upon the whim or fancy of some astute and specu latin g ‘scie ntist. Hypotheses may be sometimes admis sible, but when they are invented to support other hypot heses, they are not only to be doubted but discr edite d and discarded. “That bodies in some instances are seen to approach each other is a fact but that their mutual approach is due to an ‘ attra ction ,’ or pulling process, on the part of these bodies, is, after all, a mere theory. Then it was proven that the area in the southern hemisphere exceeded that of the northern (as consistent with the flat-Earth model) so they rever se-en ginee red another damag e-con trol expla natio n that Earth is actually not a sphere or oblate spheroid but a pear! Watch the following clip of NASA ultra -shil l Neil DeGrasse Tyson trying to explain their pear- shape d Earth. Helio centr ists have contended this for centuries now because the Earth was concl usive ly proven to be flatter than they originally claimed, so they back- peddl ed re-la belin g it an oblate spheroid flattened at the poles. več NASA and modern astronomy claim that Earth is a sphere, but not a perfect sphere, an "oblate spheroid," and not only oblate, but even bigger in the southern hemisphere like a pear. Then it was proven that the area in the southern hemisphere exceeded that of the northern (as consistent with the flat-Earth model) so they. Heliocentrists have contended this for centuries now because the Earth was conclusively proven to be flatter than they originally claimed, so they back-peddled re-labeling it an oblate spheroid flattened at the poles. NASA and modern astronomy claim that Earth is a sphere, but not a perfect sphere, an "oblate spheroid," and not only oblate, but even bigger in the southern hemisphere like a pear.